Home > Technology, UK Politics > Cost of ID cards – are we being told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Cost of ID cards – are we being told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

October 10, 2006

The Home Office now estimate that the cost of delivering and running the ID card scheme over the next ten years will be £5.4bn. All well and good (apart from the ID card part of the announcement) as the figures fall in line with the figure of £5.8bn previously estimated by the Home Office. The government has published this information as part of its first bi-annual report to parliament as required under s37 of the Identity Cards Act

However, I couldn’t identify anywhere on the Home Office website where the breakdown of these costs was given. Eventually I managed ttrackck down a copy of the report itself here. Guess what? No details except the setup costs will be £290m and the operating costs will be £5,100m. The details would have been interesting to see given the LSE reports which have estimated that the true cost to government as a whole might be somewhere between £19bn and £30bn over ten years

The LSE identity project has already published its initial response to the report in which it says “the report remains vague on many important areas of the scheme and raises important questions:”

Their response goes on to list the outstanding issues as follows :

It gives no details as to whether the new system is likely to be based on a new database (which can have proper security built in) or on existing databases which will have many inaccuracies. What is the breakdown of the ‘set-up costs’? Will this entail a new register or an adaptation of older systems?

There is no indication of when procurement is likely to begin or how long it is likely to take. When will the procurement process actually begin?

It talks confidently about successfully recording biometrics to identify individuals uniquely, but there are no immediate plans to trial possible technologies at this stage. How much will the Government spend on testing the technology, particularly secure systems required in this as well as the biometric technologies?

It refers to international obligations for passports in the Schengen area, but fails to point out that the UK is not subject to these requirements. Has the Government looked into the implementation of biometric passport in the Schengen area? Do their passport programs incur similar costs and details?

No consideration is made of the likely fees that will be charged to verify identities against the National Identity Register. Has the Government estimated costs of allowing employers to verify visas through verification against existing visa databases for foreign employment?

The claimed purpose of the Scheme continues to shift. It now appears to be primarily about illegal working and illegal immigration, rather than identity fraud which was claimed as the main purpose a year ago.

One of the expected benefits of the Scheme is convenience for citizens. What policy and cost considerations are involved in the integration of the Citizen Information Program into the National Identity Register?

So no major questions to answer then? Oh except what might we do with that £5.4bn instead? Maybe we could increase the number of Police Officers or something similarly practical. Let alone suppose the figure is larger or anywhere near the £30bn suggested by the LSE. I am sure the true figure will be way higher than the governments estimate simply because they are very clear that it does not include any costs to enable other government departments to make use of the ID card. Clearly they are going to make use of it so failing to identify and plan for the costs does not seem either sensible or realistic.

Advertisements
Categories: Technology, UK Politics
  1. Nicola
    October 10, 2006 at 4:18 pm

    Straight answer NO ….. NO ……. and NO again.

  2. budgiebird
    October 12, 2006 at 12:00 pm

    In the current climate, where life and death decisions have to be made regarding who to treat and who not to treat with new drugs via the NHS, on the basis of cost effectiveness, this ID scheme seems like an extravagent waste of money.

    This money could be far better spent on directly saving lives and improving quality of life through the NHS.

    On the day when it is announced that NICE do not consider it be cost effective to spend £2.50 per day on treatment for those in the early stages of Alzhemimers, it beggars belief that the Government is prepared to spend billions of pounds on an ID scheme which the public do not want.

    Oh well, I suppose it might have some benefits. If those with Alzheimers are not treated and get so bad that they cannot even remember their own name, at least they will have an ID card to remind them.

  3. Tony Ferguson
    October 12, 2006 at 12:13 pm

    Or of course they lose their card and then they cannot be treated as they don’t have a card and therefore dont exist!. My personal opinion is that it will be a long time before any legislation is passed making it compulsory….because they won’t need to. It will become compulsory through the back door when as you point out you need an ID card to get medical treatment, or employers are forced to demand an ID card before employing anyone. Doubtless banks will do the same, and then you will need one to get a driving license or passport or to get certain services from your local authority. I renewed my passport this year as part of a Lib Dem campaign to put off the evil day but I am still very cynical about the eventual outcome

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Comments are closed.
%d bloggers like this: